Volume 32, Issue 2 p. 311-322
KNEE

Intra-articular corticosteroid injections provide a clinically relevant benefit compared to placebo only at short-term follow-up in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Alessandro Bensa

Alessandro Bensa

Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Jacopo Albanese

Jacopo Albanese

Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Angelo Boffa

Corresponding Author

Angelo Boffa

Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

Correspondence Angelo Boffa, Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Davide Previtali

Davide Previtali

Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Filardo

Giuseppe Filardo

Service of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, EOC, Lugano, Switzerland

Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy

Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 January 2024
Citations: 2

Abstract

Purpose

To quantify the clinical relevance of intra-articular corticosteroid effects compared to placebo for the injective treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched on May 3, 2023. This study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), published in English, with no time limitation regarding publication date, comparing intra-articular corticosteroids and placebo injections for knee OA. The effects were quantified at short- (≤6 weeks), mid- (>6 weeks and ≤3 months), and long-term (≥6 months) follow-ups. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the outcomes (visual analogue scale for pain - VAS: 1.4, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index - WOMAC: 9) was used to interpret the clinical improvement provided by intra-articular corticosteroid injections compared to placebo. The quality of each article was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and the GRADE guidelines.

Results

Among the 1030 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs (842 patients) were included. A comparison of the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in the improvement of VAS and WOMAC scores in terms of the mean difference (MD); this difference was in favour of corticosteroids at short-term (p < 0.001, MD = −1.6 and p < 0.001, MD = −9.9, respectively) and mid-term follow-ups (p = 0.001, mean MD = −1.3 and p = 0.005, MD = −4.9, respectively). No difference was observed at the long-term follow-up. The MDs between the improvements in the two groups reached the MCID values for the VAS and WOMAC only at the short-term follow-up. The RoB 2 tool and the GRADE evaluations showed the presence of risk of bias and limited quality of evidence.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that intra-articular corticosteroid injections offer clinically perceivable pain relief and functional improvement higher than the placebo effect only at short-term follow-up in patients affected by knee OA, with benefits losing clinical relevance already after 6 weeks. These results, together with the low number and the limited quality of the RCTs comparing this treatment with placebo, question the indication for the use of corticosteroid injections in clinical practice for the treatment of knee OA.

Level of Evidence

Level I.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.